[Chevelle-list] Sandblaster Question: Off Topic
Rick Schaefer
rickas at gmail.com
Mon Jun 9 17:47:56 MDT 2008
They operate the same, only difference is capacity. I have the
first one & used it this AM for the first time in ages, worked fine for
me. With either of those, you will need a 60 or 80 gallon compressor.
I just upgraded my compressor last fall, today was the first time I used it
with the larger tank. I was using a 30 gallon sears compressor & I was
continuosly waiting for it to refill. The new (60 gal) was not near so
annoying.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Kyle Bennett <bkbennett at ec.rr.com> wrote:
> Just wanted to run this past the list before I made the wrong decision.
>
>
>
> Well, I'm looking for a small sandblaster for small jobs. And I noticed
> that one has a different look vs. the other so I'm sure the is a difference
> in something, I'm just not sure which is better. They are both similar in
> price but which one is better? Any pros or cons of one vs. the other. Thanks
> for any input.
>
>
>
> http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/ctaf/Displayitem.taf?itemnumber=95014
>
>
>
> http://www.harborfreight.com/cpi/ctaf/displayitem.taf?Itemnumber=93889
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kyle
>
--
Rick Schaefer
72 TPI El Camino
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://chevelles.net/pipermail/chevelle-list_chevelles.net/attachments/20080609/7012d372/attachment.html
More information about the Chevelle-list
mailing list