[Chevelle-list] 2 post lift

[SLWeaver]

You probably can think of advantage/disadvantage with both ...

A 2 post would probably be less expensive to do wheel/suspension/brakes/etc. because the 4 post (drive on) requires some kind of additional lift which (at least one type) goes on the rails of the inside of the wheel channel/ramps... 

A 2 post can be a little tight in small garage and is fixed in position, and so sometimes a pain to get in and out of car/truck after line the vehicle/lifting pads up for lifting...and then after you pull the motor and trans the weight distribution of the vehicle on the 2 post lift changes.


 
SLWeaver



----- Original Message ----
From: "HarKemAsso at aol.com" <HarKemAsso at aol.com>
To: chevelle-list at chevelles.net
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 9:31:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] 2 post lift

In a message dated 11/14/2007 9:03:39 AM Central Standard Time, slweaver at yahoo.com writes:



No idea about the quality... but I was thinking about a 4 post myself so I wouldn't have to worry as much about the stress put on the garage floor   ... how thick is the garage floor...



would't a 2- post be better for doing like wheels/tires, rear ends, lifing a body from the frame etc??

Harlan


**************************************
See what's new at http://www.aol.com


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://chevelles.net/pipermail/chevelle-list_chevelles.net/attachments/20071115/e8e7f857/attachment.html